Tag Archives: physical activity

Does Stretching Prevent Sports Injuries?

No.

This is a U.S. Army-style sit-up. I do sit-ups with my arms folded across my chest, hands on my shoulders

This is a U.S. Army-style sit-up. I do sit-ups with my arms folded across my chest, hands on my shoulders

For a couple years I’ve thought that stretching didn’t prevent injuries. Now I’ve got a scientific reference to back up my contention. Also from the abstract:

Strength training reduced sports injuries to less than 1/3 and overuse injuries could be almost halved.

h/t James Steele II

Physical Activity Reduces Prostate Cancer Risk

…according to an article in MedPageToday.

Not Darrin Carlson

Yet another reason to work out

In a forward-looking study, white men suspected of prostate cancer and scheduled for biopsy were less likely to have the disease if they were at least moderately active, according to Lionel Bañez, MD, of the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Durham N.C., and colleagues.

If they did have cancer, they were significantly less likely to have high-grade disease if they had been working out regularly, Bañez and colleagues reported  in Cancer.

Another way to reduce your risk of prostate cancer is to follow the Mediterranean diet.  Other cancers reduced by the Mediterranean diet are breast, colo-rectal, and uterus.

The association of exercise and lower prostate cancer risk was not noted in black men, for unclear reasons.

Do You Need Medical Clearance Before Starting an Exercise Program?

medical clearance, treadmill stress test

This treadmill stress test is looking for hidden heart disease

To protect you from injury, I recommend that you obtain “medical clearance” from a personal physician before starting an exercise program. A physician is in the best position to determine if your plans are safe for you, thereby avoiding complications such as injury and death. Nevertheless, most adults can start a moderate-intensity exercise program with little risk. An example of moderate intensity would be walking briskly (3–4 mph or 4.8–6.4 km/h) for 30 minutes daily.

Men over 40 and women over 50 who anticipate a more vigorous program should consult a physician to ensure safety. The physician may well recommend diagnostic blood work, an electrocardiogram (heart electrical tracing), and an exercise stress test (often on a treadmill). The goal is not to generate fees for the doctor, but to find the occasional person for whom exercise will be dangerous, if not fatal. Those who drop dead at the start of a vigorous exercise program often have an undiagnosed heart condition, such as blockages in the arteries that supply the heart muscle. The doctor will also look for other dangerous undiagnosed “silent” conditions, such as leaky heart valves, hereditary heart conditions, aneurysms, extremely high blood pressure, and severe diabetes.

She looks healthy enough, but how can you be sure?

She looks healthy enough, but how can you be sure?

The American Diabetes Association’s Standards of Care—2011 states that routine testing of all diabetics for heart artery blockages before an exercise program is not recommended; the doctor should use judgment case-by-case. Many diabetics (and their doctors) are unaware that they already have “silent” coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD is defined by blocked or clogged heart arteries, which reduced the blood flow to the hard-working heart muscle. Your heart pumps 100,000 times a day, every day, for years without rest. CAD raises the odds of fainting, heart attack, or sudden death during strenuous exercise. I recommend a cardiac stress test (or the equivalent) to all diabetics prior to moderate or vigorous exercise programs, particularly if over 40 years old. CAD can thus be diagnosed and treated before complications arise. Ask your personal physician for her opinion.

Regardless of age and diabetes, other folks who may benefit from a medical consultation before starting an exercise program include those with known high blood pressure, high cholesterol, joint problems (e.g., arthritis, degenerated discs), neurologic problems, poor circulation, lung disease, or any other significant chronic medical condition. Also be sure to check with a doctor first if you’ve been experiencing chest pains, palpitations, dizziness, fainting spells, headaches, frequent urination, or any unusual symptoms (particularly during exertion).

Physicians, physiatrists, physical therapists, and exercise physiologists can also be helpful in design of a safe, effective exercise program for those with established chronic medical conditions.

Steve Parker, M.D.

What’s Wrong With Type 2 Diabetics?

Type 2 diabetes and prediabetes are epidemics because of excessive consumption of refined sugars and starches, and lack of physical activity.  I can’t prove it; nevertheless that’s my impression after years of reading the nutrition science literature and thinking about it.

I could be wrong.  I reserve the option to change my mind based on evidence as it becomes available.  That’s one of the great things about science.  Accurately identifying the cause of diabetes could provide strong clues about optimal prevention and treatment strategies.

Genetics undoubtedly plays a major role in diabetes, but the gene pool hasn’t changed much over the last several decades as type 2 diabetes rates have soared.

The problem in type 2 diabetes and prediabetes is that the body cannot handle ingested carbohydrates in the normal fashion. In a way, dietary carbohydrates (carbs) have become toxic instead of nourishing. This is a critical point, so let’s take time to understand it.

NORMAL DIGESTION AND CARBOHYDRATE HANDLING

The major components of food are proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. We digest food either to get energy, or to use individual components of food in growth, maintenance, or repair of our own body parts.

We need some sugar (also called glucose) in our bloodstream at all times to supply us with immediate energy. “Energy” refers not only to a sense of muscular strength and vitality, but also to fuel for our brain, heart, and other automatic systems. Our brains especially need a reliable supply of bloodstream glucose.

In a normal, healthy state, our blood contains very little sugar—about a teaspoon (5 ml) of glucose. (We have about one and a third gallons (5 liters) of blood circulating. A normal blood sugar of 100 mg/dl (5.56 mmol/l) equates to about a teaspoon of glucose in the bloodstream.)

Our bodies have elaborate natural mechanisms for keeping blood sugar normal. They work continuously, a combination of adding and removing sugar from the bloodstream to keep it in a healthy range (70 to 140 mg/dl, or 3.9 to 7.8 mmol/l). These homeostatic mechanisms are out of balance in people with diabetes and prediabetes.

By the way, glucose in the bloodstream is commonly referred to as “blood sugar,” even though there are many other types of sugar other than glucose. In the U.S., blood sugar is measured in units of milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl), but other places measure in millimoles per liter (mmol/l).

When blood sugar levels start to rise in response to food, the pancreas gland—its beta cells, specifically—secrete insulin into the bloodstream to keep sugar levels from rising too high. The insulin drives the excess sugar out of the blood, into our tissues. Once inside the tissues’ cells, the glucose will be used as an immediate energy source or stored for later use. Excessive sugar is stored either as body fat or as glycogen in liver and muscle.

When we digest fats, we see very little direct effect on blood sugar levels. That’s because fat contains almost no carbohydrates. In fact, when fats are eaten with high-carb foods, they tend to slow the rise and peak in blood sugar you would see if you had eaten the carbs alone.

Ingested protein can and does raise blood sugar, usually to a mild degree. As proteins are digested, our bodies can make sugar (glucose) out of the breakdown products. The healthy pancreas releases some insulin to keep the blood sugar from going too high.

In contrast to fats and proteins, carbohydrates in food cause significant—often dramatic—rises in blood sugar. Our pancreas, in turn, secretes higher amounts of insulin to prevent excessive elevation of blood glucose. Carbohydrates are easily digested and converted into blood sugar. The exception is fiber, which is indigestible and passes through us unchanged.

During the course of a day, the pancreas of a healthy person produces an average of 40 to 60 units of insulin. Half of that insulin is secreted in response to meals, the other half is steady state or “basal” insulin. The exact amount of insulin depends quite heavily on the amount and timing of carbohydrates eaten. Dietary protein has much less influence. A pancreas in a healthy person eating a very-low-carb diet will release substantially less than 50 units of insulin a day.

To summarize thus far: dietary carbs are the major source of blood sugar for most people eating “normally.” Carbs are, in turn, the main cause for insulin release by the pancreas, to keep blood sugar levels in a safe, healthy range.

Hang on, because we’re almost done with the basic science!

You deserve a break

CARBOHYDRATE  HANDLING  IN  DIABETES  &  PREDIABETES

Type 2 diabetics and prediabetics absorb carbohydrates and break them down into glucose just fine. Problem is, they can’t clear the glucose out of the bloodstream normally. So blood sugar levels are often in the elevated, poisonous range, leading to many of the complications of diabetes.

Remember that insulin’s primary function is to drive blood glucose out of the bloodstream, into our tissues, for use as immediate energy or stored energy (as fat or glycogen).

In diabetes and prediabetes, this function of insulin is impaired.

The tissues have lost some of their sensitivity to insulin’s action. This critical concept is called insulin resistance. Insulin still has some effect on the tissues, but not as much as it should. Different diabetics have different degrees of insulin resistance, and you can’t tell by just looking.  (There are several other hormones involved in regulation of blood sugar.)

Did you know that people who work at garbage dumps, sewage treatment plants, and cattle feedlots get used to the noxious fumes after a while? They aren’t bothered by them as much as they were at first. Their noses are less sensitive to the fumes. You could call it fume resistance. In the same fashion, cells exposed to high insulin levels over time become resistant to insulin.

Insulin resistance occurs in most cases of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes. So what causes the insulin resistance? It’s debatable. In many cases it’s related to overweight, physical inactivity, and genetics. A high-carbohydrate diet may contribute. A few cases are caused by drugs. Some cases are a mystery.

To overcome the body tissue’s resistance to insulin’s effect, the pancreas beta cells pump even more insulin into the bloodstream, a condition called hyperinsulinemia. Some scientists believe high insulin levels alone cause some of the damage associated with diabetes. Whereas a healthy person without diabetes needs about 50 units of insulin a day, an obese non-diabetic needs about twice that to keep blood sugars in check. Eventually, in those who develop diabetes or prediabetes, the pancreas can’t keep up with the demand for more insulin to overcome insulin resistance. The pancreas beta cells get exhausted and start to “burn out.” That’s when blood sugars start to rise and diabetes and prediabetes are easily diagnosed. So, insulin resistance and high insulin production have been going on for years before diagnosis. By the time of diagnosis, 50% of beta cell function is lost.

Steve Parker, M.D.

EXTRA  CREDIT  FOR  INQUISITIVE  MINDS

You’ve learned that insulin’s main action is to lower blood sugar by transporting it into the cells of various tissues. But that’s not all insulin does. It also 1) impairs breakdown of glycogen into glucose, 2) stimulates glycogen formation, 3) inhibits formation of new glucose molecules by the body, 4) promotes storage of triglycerides in fat cells (i.e., lipogenesis, fat accumulation), 5) promotes formation of fatty acids (triglyceride building blocks) by the liver, 6) inhibits breakdown of stored triglycerides, and 7) supports body protein production.

In his fascinating book, Cheating Destiny: Living With Diabetes, America’s Biggest Epidemic, James Hirsch describes what happened to type 1 diabetics before insulin injections were available. Type 1 diabetics produce no insulin. Until Frederick Banting and Charles Best isolated and injected insulin in the 1920s, type 1 diabetes was a death sentence characterized not only by high blood sugars, but also extreme weight loss as muscle and fat tissue wasted away. The tissue wasting reflects insulin actions No. 4, 5, 6, and 7 above.

Banting and Best worked at the University of Toronto in Canada. Their “discovery” of insulin is one of the greatest medical achievements of all time.

Does Exercise Help With Weight Loss?

 

Enjoy your dinner!

Skyler Tanner slaughters some sacred cows in his blog post June 4, 2012. I pulled the following bullet points from his post. Click on his embedded links for details.

Comparing the effects of food and exercise on weight loss, what you eat, and how much, are more important than your physical activity.  By far.

  • Your genetics largely determines your response to an exercise program
  • Physical activity isn’t a great way to lose weight
  • School-based or other programs to increase childhood physical activity probably won’t reverse childhood obesity statistics
  • Disregarding weight loss, exercise has other worthwhile metabolic advantages
  • Highly advanced societies shouldn’t blame our overweight problem on decreased levels of physical activity

Steve Parker, M.D.

We’re Fat Because We Eat Too Much

At least one group of hunter-gatherers doesn’t burn any more calories in physical activity than Western cultures.  So much for blaming our fatness on low activity levels and labor-saving technology.

Cliff Notes version from the BBC.

—Steve

h/t Colby Vorland at nutsci.org

Exercise Motivation

No crowds and no roads: You have to be in good shape to get up here

This last winter I slacked off on my physical activity.  But in April I started Chris Highcock’s Hillfit program.  It’s based on resistance exercise, and I supplemented with high-intensity interval training on a treadmill.  All in less than an hour a week.

To help me judge effectiveness of the new plan, I measured and recorded my baseline fitness.

Exercise isn’t fun.  You need good reasons to do it.  Here are mine:

  • it keeps you young (fountain of youth)
  • longevity
  • less low back aching
  • injury resistance
  • dementia prevention
  • lowered risk of heart disease and cancer
  • I’m a sheepdog, not a sheep
  • weight management
  • emergency preparedness
  • more energy to enjoy life (hiking, camping, horseback riding, long walks with others, etc.)

If you hope to exercise regularly, you’ll need your own list of reasons.  You’ll have days, weeks, or months when you just don’t want to exercise.  Review your list then.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: Here’s my report after six weeks of Hillfit.

Minimalist Exercise

Not Darrin Carlson

Darrin Carlson on March 23, 2012, shared his ideas on the minimal amount of exercise and equipment needed to achieve reasonable fitness benefits.

Public health authorities for years have recommended physical activity in the range of 150 minutes a week.  That ain’t gonna happen for most folks.  Darrin says “Two hours a week will work for most people….”

Jonathan BailorChris Highcock, and others suggest 30-60 minutes a week may be enough.  Even Darrin admits as much, for the super-dedicated.

-Steve

How Active Were Stone Age Humans?

The Paleolithic standard for daily physical activity was about 490 calories (2.1 MJ), according to estimates by S. Boyd Eaton and Stanley B. Eaton in a 2003 article.

The Eatons estimated late Stone Age activity levels based on recent hunter-gatherer societies and skeletal remains from 50,000 to 20,000 years ago.  In case you didn’t know, our bones reflect how much work we ask them to do.  Heavy physical work loads over time lead to thicker, stronger bones, even changing the cross-sectional shape of long bones from round to oval. 

From a diabetes viewpoint, the scientists expect that our prehistoric ancestors had excellent insulin sensitivity in view of their relatively larger muscle mass and high activity levels.  They would have been less prone to develop type 2 diabetes.

Habitual high levels of physical activity of our ancestors put them in the same class as today’s elite cross-training athletes.

The Eatons suggest that replication of the Paleolithic activity level would require we exercise about an hour a day, not the 30 minutes recommended by some public health authorities. 

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Eaton, S. Boyd, and Eaton, Stanley B.  An evolutionary perspective on human physical activity: implications for healthComparative Biochemistry and Physiology: Part A Molecular and Integrative Physiology, 136 (2003): 153-159.